TrumpetBoards.com
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. SSmith1226
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 5
    • Topics 141
    • Posts 1054
    • Best 635
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Best posts made by SSmith1226

    • Perfect Pitch

      Re: need perfect pitch to play trombone ?

      The topic, “Perfect Pitch To Play the Trombone”is nearly a year old. There was very good and relevant discussion at that time. I was going to add this to the discussion, but there is an automatic message that pops up which encourages the start of a new thread. I saw the following article today and thought it was interesting in general. I’ve also included two videos with the article.

      How Can You Tell If You Have Perfect Pitch?

      Some famous musicians—from Mariah Carey to Jimi Hendrix—have a gift known as perfect pitch. What is it? Could you have it, too?

      Mariah Carey, Ella Fitzgerald, Bing Crosby, Mozart, Beethoven, Jimi Hendrix, and Yanni. What do these musicians have in common? They're all said to have perfect pitch.

      How rare is perfect pitch? If you don’t have it already, can you learn it?

      What is perfect (or absolute) pitch?

      Perfect pitch (technically known as absolute pitch) is the ability to identify, without effort, the pitch of a note.

      Let's say someone plays a D on the piano. A person with perfect pitch—and the musical training to be able to name the notes—would be able to identify the note as a D without any reference. Or they might hear a note played and be able to reproduce it on an instrument without having to search for it. If you told someone who had vocal training and perfect pitch to sing a D, they'd be able to do it easily.

      When someone can identify a note only when it's based on a reference note, that's called relative pitch. People with perfect pitch, on the other hand, don't need a reference note to label an audible tone correctly.

      How rare is perfect pitch?

      Out of every 10,000 people, only between 1 to 5 of them will have perfect pitch. Out of every 10,000 musicians, however, between 100 and 1100 (that’s 1-11%) may have the gift. Perfect pitch is also observed to run in families, which suggests it's at least partially genetic.

      Perfect pitch is more common in cultures where the language is tonal. In tonal languages, the same word said in different tones has different meanings. (That's compared to cultures where tone indicates emotion and not meaning.) One study of music students found that 60 percent of Mandarin-speaking students who had studied music since the age of four or five had perfect pitch relative to only 14 percent of English-speaking students.

      Some scientists argue that this could mean perfect pitch can be taught. That's especially true for someone who learns to alter and identify pitch from a young age, like when they're learning to speak their first language.

      Other studies have shown that perfect pitch is more common among people with autism. One study of children age 7 to 13 found that those with autism were better able to tell apart two subtlely different tones and to remember melodies weeks later than neurotypical children in the same age group. This link is particularly intriguing because understanding perfect pitch may help us understand the genetic links to autism as well as possible treatment therapies.

      Investigations into actual anatomical differences have found that the brains of people with perfect pitch look different. They have more grey matter in the area of the brain we suspect is responsible for identifying pitch, the right auditory cortex. Their right auditory cortex and their prefrontal cortex, also associated with music processing, is also thicker, suggesting more brain activity there.

      In the color analogy, a person with perfect pitch could look at a shade of blue on someone’s sweater and then go to a paint store and find the exact shade from memory.

      Interestingly, if you have perfect pitch, it’s apparently hard to understand not having it. (I say “apparently” because I was not gifted with such a high-functioning ear.)

      To understand why this is, an analogy to color is often used. Imagine someone who can see all the colors and tell them apart but can’t tell you if something is “yellow” or “blue” unless they were shown a reference color like “red” first. For those of us who see color, this makes no sense! The same goes for those with perfect pitch when they try to understand why the rest of us can’t label a note when we hear it on its own. In the color analogy, a person with perfect pitch could look at a shade of blue on someone’s sweater and then go to a paint store and find the exact shade from memory.

      So why is the ability to differentiate something like color so common but absolute pitch so rare? One group has suggested that maybe some component of perfect pitch is more common—let’s call it not-quite-perfect-but-better-than-only-capable-of-relevant pitch.

      Work led by Dr. Elizabeth Margulis at the University of Arkansas suggests that even people without any formal music training can show signs of some aspect of absolute pitch. For example, they might be able to pick out individual notes that are off-key more easily for familiar scales like C-major (think the white keys on the piano) versus less common scales like those in D-flat major (mostly black piano keys).

      Margulis and her team also find that our ability to track absolute pitch may affect how emotional we feel when listening to music. Participants in the study reported that the music felt tenser when it contained notes that were in the wrong key.

      Can you learn to have perfect pitch?

      Perfect pitch is thought to be some combination of innate ability, early childhood music exposure, and possibly training. So, if you didn’t start those music lessons at age five, is it too late for you? Historically, the belief was that you either have it or you don’t when it comes to perfect pitch. But a few recent studies have suggested that maybe the skill can be learned.

      A few recent studies have suggested that perfect pitch can be learned.

      In a small study of 17 students with varying musical backgrounds at the University of Chicago, researchers found that participants were better able to identify notes without a reference after a period of training. The training consisted of three 60-note sets for which the students were asked to identify each note after hearing it and received immediate feedback on whether or not their identification was correct. The students were not as good at identifying notes when tested again a few months later (without any additional training), but they were still better off than where they originally started.

      One group even managed to “retune” people who did have perfect pitch by effectively over-writing their tonal knowledge to new values. (Going back to our color analogy, think of someone being told to reset so that purple is now yellow.) The title of that study was, appropriately, "Absolute pitch may not be so absolute."

      How do you know if you have perfect pitch?

      Searching for “perfect pitch test” online turns up dozens of results because there is generally no agreed-upon reliable test for perfect pitch, at least not for those of us who aren’t musically trained. So there are plenty of online tests to have some fun poking at the limitations of your skills, but if you really want to know if you have perfect pitch, you may have to see a professional.

      JOIN THE SCIENCE CONVERSATION
      Do you have perfect pitch? Have you learned to identify notes with musical training? I'd love to hear about it! Join the conversation on Facebook or Twitter. If you have a question that you’d like to see on a future episode, send me an email at everydayeinstein@quickanddirtytips.com. Stay in the science loop! Listen and subscribe on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

      About the Author

      Sabrina Stierwalt, PhD
      Dr Sabrina Stierwalt earned a Ph.D. in Astronomy & Astrophysics from Cornell University and is now a Professor of Physics at Occidental College.

      posted in Miscellaneous
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: The New Reality

      I opened a thread titled “Trumpet Board Performance” to discuss this specific concept further. If possible, please address any further ideas or opinions relative to putting together a Trumpet Boards group performance video at that thread.
      Thanks.

      posted in Classical / Orchestral
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Anyone like fishing? (when taking a break from Trumpet, that is...)

      @ButchA said in Anyone like fishing? (when taking a break from Trumpet, that is...):

      Wow... Excellent photos of fish you guys have shown! 😁

      Honest - I have never been saltwater fishing. Never been out in the Atlantic, out in the Chesapeake Bay, etc... and gone fishing. I don't have the equipment (rods & reels) for it. I grew up a freshwater fisherman, all over various lakes, ponds, streams & rivers, etc... The best, most relaxing experience, is fly fishing in a shallow stream wearing waders, and nobody is around to bother you, no boats, no jet skis, and it's just you and the rushing water.

      Great Barrier Reef- Black Marlin
      03A3C350-25AF-4172-9CBE-B90118219BD8.jpeg

      posted in Lounge
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Bots are getting scary

      @j-jericho said in Bots are getting scary:

      Are we at the point at which we have conversations with programs designed to replicate the presence of humans? How profoundly does the development of this technology affect the nature of communication? Are there aspects of this path that will reveal a less than desirable journey and or destination? Will asking programs such as http://chat.openai.com/ these questions reveal reliable answers? Who's running the show, anyway? And what are their intentions? Bots are getting scary, indeed.

      posted in Pedagogy
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • Trumpet Board Remote Performance

      I thought that I would start this as a separate thread. Under the thread, “The New Reality”, many of us have posted discussion and performances of music under quarantine, from soloists, families, Big Bands, Symphony Orchestras, and world wide groups.
      Yesterday, I posted a Peruvian Trumpet Performance made up up individual performers from their living rooms all over Peru. Let me throw the following idea out to the group. Since there still are no current local performance opportunities, would there be any interest in putting together a video such as this and others on this thread, made up of Trumpet Board members. This could include members from anywhere in the world. Each individual recording can be made with iPhone, similar equipment, or more professional equipment, if available. The biggest stumbling block would be the editing and production. I have neither the know how, the software, or hardware to pull this off. Let me open this idea to the group to see whether this is viable. If someone has a simple solution to the technical problem, I would be willing to explore it and see whether I can take this on.

      posted in Miscellaneous
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Is It Jazz or Is It Classical?

      Here is a link to a timely article from today’s issue of The Guardian on this subject:

      https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/jun/06/why-classical-musicians-need-to-learn-how-to-improvise

      1D367396-C486-4E7C-A330-37630A3A72CB.jpeg

      posted in Classical / Orchestral
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Anyone like fishing? (when taking a break from Trumpet, that is...)

      BC2E21A4-B94F-4CB4-BBB8-64BA7EA6F888.jpeg @ButchA
      Butch,
      Your post brings back fond memories. I also got my love of fishing from my father. When I grew up up in the 1950’s, my father owned a 1940’s 3 1/2 hp Scott Attwater outboard engine. He would rent a row boat from Cameron’s Boat Rentels in New Rochelle, NY, mount the outboard engine, and off we would go catching flounder, porgy, bergal, weakfish, blackfish, Boston Mackerel, or what ever else was out there.
      As time went on, he purchased a 16 ft boat with a 35 hp Johnston engine, then a 21 ft boat, then a 30 ft Criss Craft Sea Skiff. He then followed the pattern of many boat owners and the boats started getting smaller until all he had was a 3 1/2 hp Scott Attwater engine, an Evinrude 5 hp outboard, and an old used row boat that he bought from Cameron’s Boat Rentals when they upgraded their fleet of rental boats. When the wood row boat rotted beyond repair, he was left with the outboard engines.
      Interestingly, I followed the same pattern, advancing to a 34 foot charter fishing boat, that I had in charter for 12 years in Marathon, FL., and currently I am very happy to be boat-less. If I want to go fishing, I will charter someone else’s “headache”, and catch more fish then I would on my own.
      For what it is worth, the above photos are of my father’s 30 ft Criss Craft Sea Skiff with me standing and him sitting in the stern area.

      posted in Lounge
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Bots are getting scary

      An article today from the New York Post:
      “ChatGPT could make these jobs obsolete: ‘The wolf is at the door’”. The link is below.
      One of the more interesting facts mentioned was that the chat bot scored higher than many humans on the MBA Exam administered by the Wharton School Of Business. A link corroborating this also is included.

      https://nypost.com/2023/01/25/chat-gpt-could-make-these-jobs-obsolete/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=mail_app

      https://nypost.com/2023/01/23/chatgpt-outperforms-humans-on-wharton-mba-exam-professor/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=mail_app

      posted in Pedagogy
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Trumpet Board Remote Performance

      @tjcombo said in Trumpet Board Remote Performance:

      @SSmith1226 and co-conspirators, thanks, I enjoyed that very much.
      Nice video editing too!

      Thanks for the complements. On behalf of myself and the co-conspirators, which by the way is a very polite, proper, and appropriate term, we thank you for your very kind words.

      posted in Miscellaneous
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: The New Reality

      @neal085 said in The New Reality:

      Also, is that Fred Flintstone's car going past at the 5:08 mark?

      You’re right! Here is a screen shot.

      B87F1CD0-4E24-47D5-A28A-A1DB688E06CF.jpeg

      posted in Classical / Orchestral
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: And I thought we were exposed playing the Trumpet

      The point of my post was 1) I didn’t realize the French Horn was so difficult to play and unpredictable. ( I have enough problems with the Trumpet) 2) I was rather surprised that the New York Times published this piece that was so critical of French Horn Players, especially the 27 year ( at the time of this article) Principal Horn Player of the New York Philharmonic. He retired from this position 10 years after this article was published at age 68. 3) shortly after entering High School the French Horn playing Band Director tried to get me to “convert” to the French Horn. I too resisted and worked my way up to the First Trumpet folder by senior year. 4) while traveling in Spain I picked up a Stomvi Corno da Caccia, , AKA Soprano French Horn, that plays with a Trumpet or Flugelhorn Mouthpiece. It sounds and plays more like a 4 Valve Bb Flugelhorn. It seemed to amaze Horn Players in my Community Band that I could play it with relative ease. Now I know why. As best I can tell it is essentially a Flugelhorn with a different configuration. 5) I’ve had the idea in the back of my mind to pick up an eBay of GW double French Horn and experiment. I now will probably take a pass on that.

      posted in Lounge
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Bots are getting scary

      The bot is obviously very selective. Very scary.

      StevenP.webp
      Please create an original joke

      Why did the tomato turn red?

      Because it saw the salad dressing!

      %3e.svg
      StevenP.webp
      Another

      Why don't scientists trust atoms?
      Because they make up everything.

      %3e.svg
      StevenP.webp
      Make up an original trumpet joke

      Why did the trumpet player bring two sets of clothes to the gig?
      In case he got a-trumpeted!

      %3e.svg
      StevenP.webp
      I don’t understand. Please explain

      The joke is a play on words, using the double meaning of "a-trumpeted". The first meaning is that the trumpet player is so good that he "a-trumpeted" the competition, meaning he surpassed them. The second meaning is a pun on the word "attacked" - the trumpet player brought a spare set of clothes in case he got "a-trumpeted", meaning physically attacked or beaten up, perhaps by an angry audience member. It's a joke about how trumpet players are often seen as arrogant or boastful, and the punchline is that this particular trumpet player is so good that he is worried he might get beaten up for it.

      %3e.svg
      StevenP.webp
      What is the funniest joke you can make up about trumpet players

      What do you call a trumpet player with half a brain? Gifted.
      It's a play on words, a trumpet player is often seen as less intelligent and this joke is making fun of the stereotype, the punchline is "gifted" which means talented or clever, however it is also a play on the word half brain, as in being not fully intelligent, it's a self-deprecating joke and should be taken in good humor.

      posted in Pedagogy
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Trumpet Board Remote Performance

      @IrishTrumpeter
      We all thank you.

      posted in Miscellaneous
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: The New Reality

      @Dr-GO said in The New Reality:

      I find taking my shoes off guarantees there will be social distancing!

      Adding. a “Plant Based Diet” to that will give you at least a 12 foot radius of clearance.

      posted in Classical / Orchestral
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Anyone like fishing? (when taking a break from Trumpet, that is...)

      @Tobylou8 said in Anyone like fishing? (when taking a break from Trumpet, that is...):

      1- LONG skinny fish
      2- Short skinny fish
      3- Fishing lure

      😜 😜 😜 😜

      Close, but not the answers I was looking for. Due to the overwhelming response to this quiz I’ll give the group 24 more hrs, and then post the correct answers if the mystery is not solved by then.

      posted in Lounge
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Bots are getting scary

      @trumpetb
      This is not quite as simple as you presented it. Below is an article from “Daily Beast” going into more detail.

      AI Just Flew an F-16 for 17 Hours. This Could Change Everything.

      https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/ai-just-flew-f-16-143000286.html

      As if we didn’t have enough to worry about with AI taking over the world and mysterious objects flying through the sky, the U.S. military decided to up the ante by creating a bot that can fly a fighter jet by itself.

      The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) announced on Feb. 13that it successfully tested an F-16 test aircraft with an AI software that flew the aircraft for 17 hours. The plane, called the Variable In-flight Simulator Test Aircraft (VISTA) X-62A, took flight in December 2022 at the Air Force Test Pilot School in California.

      Though we’ve seen autopilot features be used on airplanes before, this marks the first time that a bot has ever taken control of a fighter plane—and could one day open the doors for fully autonomous and uncrewed jets piloted entirely by AI.

      “VISTA will allow us to parallelize the development and test of cutting-edge artificial intelligence techniques with new uncrewed vehicle designs,” M. Christopher Cotting, the director of research for the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School, said in a statement. He added that the system “will rapidly mature autonomy for uncrewed platforms and allow us to deliver tactically relevant capability to our warfighter.”

      Of course, this sort of thing probably conjures up more images of Skynet going live and killing all of humanity in The Terminator than it does the high-flying stunts of Top Gun. However, the software is actually designed to allow the VISTA to mimic other planes. That means that student pilots can train to fly everything from the massive B-52 bomber to smaller fighter jets all on the F-16.

      A recent upgrade called the System for Autonomous Control of Simulation allowed the VISTA to test its autonomous F-16 AI. Using the software, the plane was capable of taking off and landing by itself as well as performing “against various simulated adversaries, and with simulated weapons capabilities,” Lt. Col. Ryan Hefron, program manager for the Aerial Combat Evolution (ACE) program at DARPA, said in a statement.

      It should be noted that a pilot was on board to make sure that there was a human to grab the sticks and take over in case it wanted to go rogue. Hefron added that the AI allowed pilots to learn more about how to respond to certain situations in and out of aerial combat.

      DARPA launched the ACE program in 2019 in order to research and incorporate AI into its jet fighters. The idea is that autonomous warfighters can help give human pilots a leg up during dogfights. The program is also a part of a larger movement within the Department of Defense to embrace AI and use it to bolster the country’s defense and national security. In 2022, the U.S. spent nearly $3 billion on AI research alone.

      The implications are fairly horrifying. For one, having an autonomous F-16 means that bots will now be able to potentially engage enemy aircraft—something UAV drones cannot do. Also unlike a UAV, an F-16 can carry a much larger payload of 20,000 lbs compared to a drone’s 3,800 lbs. It’s a vastly more sophisticated and deadly weapon, and now the U.S. military wants to have a robot control it.

      On top of all this, AI doesn’t exactly have a sterling track record—having been known to fall prey to racism, sexism, bias, and hallucinations. The consequences of relying on artificial intelligence are already pretty dire when using them for things like home loans or sentencing hearings. Imagine what happens when the stakes are as high as World War III.

      posted in Pedagogy
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Trumpet Board Remote Performance

      @Dale-Proctor
      I put this together in a similar fashion. There was a lot of audio editing. By the time I was ready to do the video I was over it, especially since I was the audio and video guy as well as the performer.

      posted in Miscellaneous
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: The New Reality

      The New Reality for the Boston Symphony Orchestra / Boston Pops Trumpet section.

      posted in Classical / Orchestral
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: And I thought we were exposed playing the Trumpet

      @barliman2001 said in And I thought we were exposed playing the Trumpet:

      @SSmith1226 So you did get that Stomvi corno... does Barbara know?

      She was with me in Valencia. As a result it indirectly cost me twice as much!

      posted in Lounge
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • RE: Bots are getting scary

      @trumpetb
      I will preface this by saying that I am not an expert in aeronautical engineering, or the operation of aircraft. For that matter I have no special knowledge of these fields, although “I did once sleep in Holiday Inn Express”.
      As a low ranking amateur in this field I see the development of Aeronautical Artificial Inelegance as a spectrum, or bell shaped curve. I would consider the current development of a totally AI controlled F-16 Fighter significantly shifting the curve to the left and displacing the highest level of prior technology up to this point to a lower level of sophistication relative to the rest of the field.
      
      Today, most commercial and military flights use automation systems that rely on artificial intelligence (AI) to assist pilots in controlling the aircraft. These systems can help with tasks such as maintaining altitude, airspeed, and course, as well as detecting and avoiding obstacles and adverse weather conditions. These systems are collectively referred to as "autopilots," and they have been in use for many years.

      However, it's important to note that the level of automation and the extent to which AI is used in a particular flight depends on many factors, including the type of aircraft, the operator, the route, and the specific phase of flight. Commercial and military flights are not fully controlled by artificial intelligence (AI). For example, some flights may use autopilot for the majority of the flight, while others may rely on manual control by the pilot for most of the time. Additionally, pilots are always responsible for monitoring the automation systems and ensuring that the aircraft is operating safely and efficiently.
      While some aspects of flights can be automated, such as takeoff, cruising, and landing, pilots still play a critical role in ensuring the safety of flights. They are responsible for making important decisions and responding to unexpected situations that may arise during a flight. The role of automation in aviation is to assist pilots and enhance their ability to operate aircraft safely and efficiently. The extent to which automation is used varies depending on the aircraft and the operator, and there are strict regulations and standards that must be met to ensure the safety of flights.
      In other words, I would consider an AI Control that eventually might fly a pilotless military aircraft in combat, including air to air combat, a significant advance over current systems. Just imagine where technology will be in 100 years. As an example, compare where we are today to where we were 100 years ago, four years before Charles A. Lindbergh completed the first solo, nonstop transatlantic flight in history, flying his Spirit of St. Louis from Long Island, New York, to Paris, France.
      I found your reference to the “ The most common phrase uttered by Pilots in the cockpits turned out to be "What is it doing now???”, interesting. From this statement I could not determine whether this phrase referred to the effects of weather, mechanical issues, electrical issues, hydraulic issues, environmental issues, Autopilot issues, etc. I searched for the study and could not find it. I know that there is an Airbus YouTube channel with this name that is educational and instructive in many and, if not. all of these areas, if not more. I could not find the study with this conclusion, or explanation of what it was referring to. If you have the reference, please either post it or send it to me as a PM. I would be interested in the conclusions.
      Thanks, Now back to trumpet playing!

      posted in Pedagogy
      SSmith1226
      SSmith1226
    • 1
    • 2
    • 19
    • 20
    • 21
    • 22
    • 23
    • 31
    • 32
    • 21 / 32