Martin Committee Club

For those wanting to join in on the first session in January, the First Sunday Jazz Jam is featuring Cincinnati's premier trumpet player, Mike Wade. I will be there as well so bring your axe if you are nearby and get the chance to play with Mike:

Maybe not New Years Eve, but close. If you are in Dayton and looking for a relaxing evening to recover from the New Years Eve Partying, come on by tomorrow evening in Dayton's Historic Arcade!

@barliman2001 said in Calicchio trumpets:

Several reasons come to mind...

1. Many professionals have been contracted as Signature Artists - they get paid (sometimes huge sums) to play on a certain manufacturer's horns, and endorse them. Their personal horns are then crafted to whatever specification they prefer. So it may well be that some professionals are playing Committee clones - we just don't know.

True enough. I had the tremendous honor to play a concert with Allen Vizzutti and during rehearsal in which I played my Committee, Allen came over to me to say he really admired that horn and until coming over to being a Yamaha sponsored musician, was playing the Committee.

Till Bronner and I also had the chance to play together and he too shared his admiration for the Committee. He is also a Yamaha sponsored musician.

@flugler said in Calicchio trumpets:

I have played both Martin Committees and Calicchio trumpets. I don't like the Martins. They got their reputation because I think some famous players played them (like Miles). But I find them dead sounding. I play in big bands, and need to project. They don't..

I somewhat cautiously agree with this but rather then call them dead sounding, perhaps the better term is it can produce a rather subdued quality. For this reason, I play my Committee with my performances with small group ensembles that play more from the Miles song book as well as serving more as back up for a rhythm section or for female vocalists (therefore a more subdued sound). I do and rather choose play all my big band performances with my Harrelson that has quite different projection characteristics than the Committee.

However there was this performer some may have heard of, Dizzy Gillespie, that was known as a big band, high range trumpet player that was more associated with the iconic bent-bell trumpet Committee to enhance its projection; however, he did experiment with Martin Committee trumpets for more than a decade in his career before switching to the King silver flair. Mick Gillette of Tower of Power fame was also known for his lead chop performed with that band on the Committee. So I caution be careful when generalizing. The use of this horn is more related to the ability of the owner. It is an amazingly versatile horn.

@Richard-III said in Martin Committee:

I suppose the good news when spending large amounts of cash for a vintage trumpet is that when you have to have the valves rebuilt, the cost seems less?

Committee valves are amazing. My 1946 had no valve work when I received it in the early 2000s. All pistons without any wear pattern. The action is faster than any of my horns, even my newest, a 2017 Harrelson.

I have played several other Committee. Tom Green (a well known trumpet refurbisher) sends me Committee horns to play and review after he refurbishes them prior to releasing them out on the market. There is not a single vintage Committee he has sent me that 1) required valve work; 2) has had any problems what so ever with valve function. I just reviewed a 1947 Committee for him not too long ago. Another consistently great Martin Committee!

A vintage Martin Committee is a great horn. I know. I own one. It is my favorite of all my horns. Why? Because I play it well and it plays me well... better than any horn I have ever played or owned. Is it worth $7.000? You will only know that answer once you play one.

I lucked out on my horn. I bid for it on e-bay. I offered the first bid at a ridiculous underbid ($2,000). After that bid, it was taken down by the seller. I contacted the seller and they said my starting bid scared them. So I told them I would buy it from the seller straight out, no more bidding for $3,000. The seller said yes. So I became a proud owner of a 1946 Martin Committee, with a serial number 7 away of one the Committees Miles played in the '40s.

So yes, I have a mythical horn but I play it well and it plays me well. Was it worth $3,000? Did I mention it is my favorite horn? Oh yeah, I have a Harrelson Summit, brushed silver bell and 24k gold tuning slides, selling for $12,000 the year it was mailed to me in 2017. My Martin Committee still gives me more pleasure than the Harrelson, so yeah, I bought it for $3,000, but it means more to me than a horn that would cost me $12,000 to replace.

Not sure if that answers your question. But if that 1957 plays the same as my 1946 horn, I would pay $7,000 for that horn.

My choice was to play a big band Christmas church performance with 19 others, playing Stan Kenton Christmas charts...

or

Playing a more traditional Lutheran Church service with just me playing descant Hymnal trumpet parts and an Organist.

Not such a tough choice... do I divide the collection plate with 19 individuals, or just 2?.. Hum!

@barliman2001 said in Christmas stand-in...:

Just got a call from a choir conductor... he needs me as second trumpet in Mozart's Piccolomini Mass on Christmas Day...
modern, well-heated church, playing in the organ loft (civvies permitted)... so all the plans of spending Christmas Day with my mother-in-law went overboard - no turkey for me!

Maybe when you return home, there may still be room in the dog house!

Wow, what a tough decision you have to make.

I had the choice between getting stuck in snow or chilling on a beach in Mexico. As you can imagine, I agonized over that decision for months.

Which reminds me....Maynard had some kind of frankenhorn with both a slide and valves. Anybody remember what this thing was called?